Redesign Your Org to Retain Your Talent

A new malaise has hit our workplaces – people moaning about not experiencing ‘career growth’. As I wrote in my earlier post, a knee jerk reaction of making available career paths (with the fine print that they need to work hard and be patient to see results), does not help. People take one look at them, like a sick pet looks at its bowl of food, and turn away, still looking sad and bleary-eyed.

They do not want to see options. They are, usually, smart enough to have figured out the options already. They want something else – maybe a promotion, a different shift or department, some new learning or role. And they want it NOW!

Organizational Design experts will tell you that you need to design your org not just to get your work done but also to accommodate and care for your talent.

While the talent force of today is young & restless and craves for career growth, our org designs continue to be old-fashioned and traditional.

They do not provide nooks and crannies, in addition to the regular solid steps up to the castle. Places where the people can keep hopping to and fro till they get ready to place a firm foot on the next step.

What am I talking about? I am saying, Leaders, wake up and re-design your orgs. Don’t just have traditional ‘roles’ people can grow into: supplement them with:-

1)      Rota Roles – This is a new word I have coined which combines ‘rotating’ and ’roles’. Identify the roles in your orgs which can be rotated between various folks who have shown promise. These augment the current role (s)he holds.

 

For instance, if there is a role requirement for data analytics or the HR care for your department, do not set up a new role for it. Instead, provide it as a role-augmentation to people who can scale up. It makes them feel valued, helps them learn on the job, and voila, it prepares your talent bench.

 

2)      RevRoles – Let’s say the function is going through a change, grappling with a new challenge. Set up transition roles or 6-9 month durations that will contribute to the ‘Rev-Up’.

 

While the people continue doing their existing roles, they are handpicked to a new change management team, invested upon by the leaders, and they design and drive the change. In the process, they learn about a new function and get ready for taking it up at a later stage.

 

3)      Loan Roles – Loan out your promising folks as to another function on a part-time basis. This requires some org maturity and inter-departmental synergies. But, if handled well, it gives the people exposure, excitement about being the ‘chosen ones’ and cross-functional depth.

 

Do this exercise – think of a good talent you have in your team. You do not have the option of promoting him, or giving him a role that he wants at the moment. Can you apply one of the above to calm his restlessness? Think about it.

Retaining talent in today’s markets is tough. But, with a keeping your ears to the ground and being willing to try out new ways of engagement may solve some of that problem.  Your thoughts?

 

9 Responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Sarosh on June 30, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Rachna this is one more of those really interesting articles and a real eye opener from your end. I can vouch for this myself being in the growth phase of the learners curve. Wish I could write as well as you :-) However, i do look forward to many more such articles from you.

    Reply

  2. Posted by Joel Indrupati on June 30, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    Nice post. Your 3R formula is wonderful for HR people. It can certainly motivate and retain staff who seem eager to move on, but are bored with current status and feel uncared for, when it comes to ‘career growth’. Though I feel that the ‘rev’ coinage could be something better in the nomenclature than that you propose. Its a fresh new look at the job enrichment act. Keep writing. :-) These are good insights.

    Reply

  3. On employee care, I really admire the new media companies like Yahoo and Google. Believe it or not, free food on demand has been a great motivator. I suppose intellectual stimulation zones which combine pursuit of hobbies, relaxation and experimentation can be great ways to de stress and also generate ideas that can further enrich roles and help people grow as individuals. Great thoughts in your article. Missed your sardonic sense of humour here though!

    Reply

  4. Posted by Senior on July 1, 2008 at 9:52 am

    This is contrarian to the popular theory and hence very refreshing. The popular theory is based on “career planning / pathing / growth” which to my mind are anticoncepts (an anti-concept is an unnecessary and rationally unusable term designed to replace and obliterate some legitimate concept – for more on this read Ayn Rand) as opposed to more real principles / practices like “Play to people’s strengths”, “Careers fit people – not the other way round”…Just look around you and figure out how many careers (including yours) were planned.

    Reply

  5. Posted by rachnaunedited on July 1, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Thanks for the encouraging comments!

    I believe its time for organizations to look at some radical org design changes to create a mesh to accomodate and grow talent, particularly the young and restless. Traditional rotation and promotion policies are myopic and simplistic solutions – like building flyovers to solve Bangalore’s traffic problems :-)

    And guys, I am experimenting with leaving aside naughty humor for the time being!!

    Reply

  6. Posted by Vijay on July 1, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    Focus of our workforce/talentforce is often personal progression in terms of $, title and city location etc. Consequently, the progression in terms of learning and capabilities takes a back seat. Your idea of rota/rev/loan roles is great and I have personally used them to great effect. The problem still remains with people not willing to get to rota/rev/loan roles. The challenge, threfore, is to make people see that the organisational nooks and crannies that you recommend are really growth enablers. When we have established the fact that those who go thru this process are bigger achievers there will be a clamour for such roles.

    Well said Rachna. Keep going.

    Reply

  7. Posted by Rachna on July 1, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    That’s the challenge with young folks – telling Nikki that spinach is good for her is not easy! :-)

    Long-term career plg does seem to be a four-letter word for the young and restless ;-)

    Though, to be fair, I have seen some of the younger folks take on nicely to rota/rev/loan roles – what helps is timely and ongoing counselling. Once they see substantial learning coming in, along with a premium tag of having got a role-augmentation does help calm the restlessness.

    Vijay, how about a rota-role for me? :-)

    Reply

  8. I have a comment about the loan roles…i tried with 2 of my team members by sending them into loan roles..i am having difficulty in getting the loan repaid though its much past its due date…this sounds easy (and that’s why i fell for it)..but has its dark side…

    As for Rota & Rev roles…. not everyone can be a square peg in a square hole…and the pegs (in my team’s context) who can fit in, normally tend to be the ones who have many square holes awaiting them…what would you suggest the kind of additional roles for people who are round pegs…square holes?

    Reply

  9. Posted by Rachna on July 8, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    Sudeep, These changes have to be systemic, in the org design itself. The struggles you are mentioning are very likely if teams/pockets/individual managers try them out. Thanks for the observation!

    Reply

Respond to this post